Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Retro computer history

 from Wikipedia:

Cromemco - Wikipedia

Cromemco, Inc. was a Mountain View, California microcomputer company known for its high-end Z80-based S-100 bus computers and peripherals in the early days of the personal computer revolution.

The company began as a partnership in 1974 between Harry Garland and Roger Melen, two Stanford Ph.D. students. The company was named for their residence at Stanford University (Crothers Memorial, a Stanford dormitory reserved for engineering graduate students). Cromemco was incorporated in 1976 and their first products were the Cromemco Cyclops digital camera, and the Cromemco Dazzler color graphics interface - both groundbreaking at the time - before they moved on to making computer systems.

In December 1981, Inc. magazine named Cromemco in the top ten fastest-growing privately held companies in the U.S.[1] In 1987, it was acquired by Dynatech Corporation of Boston.

================

SWTPC - Wikipedia

Southwest Technical Products Corporation, or SWTPC, was an American producer of electronic kits, and later complete computer systems. It was incorporated in 1967 in San Antonio, Texas, succeeding the Daniel E. Meyer Company. In 1990, SWTPC became Point Systems, before ceasing a few years later.

==============

Shugart Associates - Wikipedia

Shugart Associates (later Shugart Corporation) was a computer peripheral manufacturer that dominated the floppy disk drive market in the late 1970s and is famous for introducing the 5+14-inch "Minifloppy" floppy disk drive. In 1979 it was one of the first companies to introduce a hard disk drive form factor compatible with a floppy disk drive, the SA1000 form factor compatible with the 8-inch floppy drive form factor.

Founded in 1973, Shugart Associates was purchased in 1977 by Xerox, which then exited the business in 1985 and 1986,[1] selling the brand name and the 8-inch floppy product line (in March 1986) to Narlinger Group,[2] which ultimately ceased operations circa 1991.

===============

Sage Computer Technology - Wikipedia

SAGE Computer Technology was a computer company based in Reno, NevadaUnited States. It was founded in 1981 by Rod Coleman, Bill Bonham and Bob Needham; it went through several name changes. The change from Sage computer came about when "Sage Software" in Maryland demanded cessation of use of the name Sage in the computer segment.[1]

  • SAGE Computer Technology
- created the Sage II and Sage IV computers based on the Motorola 68000 microprocessor.
  • SAGE Computer
  • Stride Micro
    • MicroSage Computer Systems (a wholly owned subsidiary, 1987)
- created the Stride 420, Stride 440, Stride 460 (VME),[2] Stride 660 and Stride 740 computers.

=====================

Percom - Wikipedia

Percom Data Corporation was an early microcomputer company formed in 1976 to sell peripherals into the emerging microcomputer market. They are best known for their floppy disk systems, first for S-100 machines, and the later for other platforms like the TRS-80 and Atari 8-bit computers.[2] The company was purchased by Esprit Systems in 1984.

======================

Anderson Jacobson - Wikipedia

Anderson Jacobson, also known for a time as CXR Anderson Jacobson and today as CXR Networks, is a vendor of communications equipment.

Anderson Jacobson formed in California in 1967 as a spin-off from SRI International (then the Stanford Research Institute),[1] to commercialize its acoustic coupling modem designs. In the 1970s and 1980s, the company manufactured modems, some intended for consumers.[2] The introduction of the Hayes Smartmodem in 1981 led to many early vendors, including Anderson Jacobson, being forced from the market as newer companies entered at ever lower price points.

The company was acquired by CXR Telecom in 1988,[1][3] at which time The Times was following Anderson Jacobson's earnings reports.[4] The flow of new products continued.[5]

Today the company is a privately owned communication equipment vendor supplying products to Telecom Carriers, Service Providers, and the Defense, Transport and Utility markets. The company is headquartered in Abondant, France.[6][7]

========================

Mountain Computer - Wikipedia

Mountain Computer, Inc. (also known as Mountain Hardware[1]) was a privately held[2] American computer peripheral manufacturer active as an independent company from 1977 to 1988. In its early years, the company chiefly developed products for the Apple II, including sound synthesizerssamplers, and hard disk and tape drives. Mountain also produced floppy disk duplicators for enterprise use. In the mid-1980s Mountain pivoted to focusing on products for the IBM Personal Computer and compatibles. In late 1988, the company was acquired by Nakamichi.

=========

Digital Research - Wikipedia

Digital Research, Inc. (DR or DRI) was a privately held American software company created by Gary Kildall to market and develop his CP/M operating system and related 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit systems like MP/MConcurrent DOSFlexOSMultiuser DOSDOS PlusDR DOS and GEM. It was the first large software company in the microcomputer world.[9] Digital Research was originally based in Pacific Grove, California, later in Monterey, California.

======

Gary Kildall - Wikipedia

Gary Arlen Kildall (/ˈkɪldɔːl/; May 19, 1942 – July 11, 1994) was an American computer scientist and microcomputer entrepreneur. During the 1970s, Kildall created the operating system CP/M among other operating systems and programming tools,[5] and subsequently founded Digital Research, Inc. to market and sell his software products. He is considered a pioneer of the personal computer revolution.[6][7]

Kildall information plaque Pacific Grove, California

In 1974 in Pacific Grove, California, Kildall demonstrated the first working prototype of CP/M, which would later become the dominant operating system for microcomputers for a time.[8] Together with his invention of the BIOS (Basic Input Output System), his operating system allowed a microprocessor-based computer to communicate with disk storage.[9] Kildall was among the earliest individuals to recognize microprocessors as fully capable computers.[6] During the 1980s, Kildall also appeared on PBS as co-host of Computer Chronicles, a weekly informational program that discussed the latest developments in personal computing.

Several notable employees worked at Digital Research, some of which later made important contributions to the IT industry, such as:

=================

Stewart Cheifet - Wikipedia

Stewart Cheifet (/ʃɛˈf/ ; September 24, 1938 – December 28, 2025) was an American television presenter, best known for his work presenting and producing Computer Chronicles and Net Cafe. He also worked in other reporting positions for PBS and ABC, and others. Raised in Philadelphia, he attended Central High School and graduated from the University of Southern California in 1960 with a degree in Mathematics and Psychology and went on to graduate from Harvard Law School. Cheifet taught broadcast journalism classes at the Donald W. Reynolds School of Journalism at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Cheifet died in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on December 28, 2025, at the age of 87, from the flu, according to his daughter.[4][5][6]

=========================

Texas Instruments - Wikipedia

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) is an American multinational semiconductor company headquartered in Dallas, Texas.[5] It is one of the top 10 semiconductor companies worldwide based on sales volume.[6] The company's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which account for more than 80% of its revenue.[7] TI also produces digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology[7] products including calculatorsmicrocontrollers, and multi-core processors.[8]

===================

Percom - Wikipedia

Percom Data Corporation was an early microcomputer company formed in 1976 to sell peripherals into the emerging microcomputer market. They are best known for their floppy disk systems, first for S-100 machines, and the later for other platforms like the TRS-80 and Atari 8-bit computers.[2] The company was purchased by Esprit Systems in 1984.

 

 

Monday, May 4, 2026

VAX 11/780

 from copilot:

The VAX‑11/780 is one of the most important minicomputers in computing history. Introduced by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) in 1977, it effectively defined what people meant by “VAX” and helped shape modern computer architecture.

Here’s a clear overview, from context to technical details and impact.


What “VAX‑11/780” Means

  • VAX = Virtual Address eXtension
  • 11 = marketing continuity with DEC’s earlier PDP‑11 line
  • 780 = roughly “0.78 MIPS” (a performance rating by DEC’s internal metric)

Despite the name, it was not a PDP‑11; it was a completely new 32‑bit architecture.


Why It Mattered

The VAX‑11/780 was revolutionary because it combined:

  • True 32‑bit computing
  • Virtual memory built into the architecture
  • A rich, expressive instruction set designed to support high‑level languages

For universities, research labs, and businesses, it became the machine of the late 1970s and 1980s.


Architecture Highlights

Word Size & Memory

  • 32‑bit architecture
  • Virtual address space: up to 4 GB (huge for the time)
  • Demand‑paged virtual memory with hardware support

Instruction Set (CISC)

  • Classic CISC design:
    • Hundreds of instructions
    • Variable‑length instructions
    • Memory‑to‑memory operations
  • Designed to make compiled code compact and expressive
  • Excellent support for:
    • Procedure calls
    • Stack frames
    • Data structures

This made VAX machines very friendly to languages like C, FORTRAN, Pascal, and later Ada.


Performance

  • Roughly 1 MIPS (million instructions per second)
  • Slower in raw speed than later RISC machines, but very powerful for its era
  • Performance was respectable because much work could be done in fewer instructions


Operating Systems

The VAX‑11/780 ran several influential operating systems:

  • VMS (later OpenVMS) – DEC’s flagship OS
    • Highly reliable
    • Strong security model
    • Still in use today (on modern hardware)
  • BSD UNIX
    • The VAX became the platform for early BSD development
    • Many UNIX features (job control, TCP/IP stack refinements) matured on VAX systems

If you’ve used modern UNIX or Linux, you’re indirectly benefiting from VAX‑era work.


Hardware Form

  • Typically filled one or more refrigerator‑sized cabinets
  • Used TTL logic (no microprocessor yet)
  • Consumed significant power and required cooling
  • Peripheral ecosystem included:
    • Disk drives (RP06, RM03, etc.)
    • Tape drives
    • Serial terminals (VT100 was iconic)


Historical Impact

The VAX‑11/780:

  • Dominated academic computing in the late ’70s and ’80s
  • Became the reference machine for operating‑system research
  • Influenced later CPU and OS design—even as RISC later rejected many CISC ideas
  • Marked the high point of minicomputers before workstations and PCs took over

A famous saying from the era:


“If you haven’t used a VAX, you don’t know what a real computer is.”



Decline

  • In the late 1980s–1990s, RISC processors (SPARC, MIPS, PA‑RISC) surpassed VAX in performance per watt
  • DEC eventually replaced VAX with Alpha
  • Still, VAX systems lingered in production for decades due to VMS reliability


If you’d like, I can:

  • Compare the VAX‑11/780 to the PDP‑11 or early RISC machines
  • Explain why VAX CISC lost to RISC despite its elegance
  • Talk about VMS vs UNIX on VAX
  • Or connect VAX ideas to modern CPUs and operating systems

What angle are you most interested in?


Saturday, May 2, 2026

Ideas for posts on Threads

 From copilot;

Here are five high‑engagement Threads post ideas that work well across niches, with ready‑to‑use examples you can adapt:

  1. Finish-the-thought prompts
    These invite quick, low‑effort replies.
    “One thing people
    underestimate about success is ______.”

  2. Hot take (without being hostile)
    Slightly contrarian opinions spark conversation.
    “Hot take: Consistency matters more than talent. Agree or disagree?”

  3. A/B choice questions
    People love picking sides—and commenting shorter answers.
    “Which are you more productive with: 
  4. A) Early mornings 
  5. B) Late nights”

  6. Personal lesson + open question
    Vulnerability builds trust and replies.
    “Something I learned the hard way: You don’t need permission to start. 
  7. What’s a lesson life taught you late?”

  8. Relatable micro‑moment
    Familiar experiences get replies and shares.
    “That moment when you reread a message 5 times before hitting send 😅 
  9. Tell me I’m not alone.”

Bonus tip:
End posts with
one clear question and keep them under 2–4 short lines—Threads boosts content that gets replies fast.

If you want, tell me your niche or goal (teaching, writing, business, humor, etc.), and I’ll tailor five high‑performing posts specifically for you.


Friday, May 1, 2026

Tidally locked planet orbiting a black hole

 From copilot:

Short answer: yes—but the difference is usually tiny unless the planet is extremely close to the black hole.

Let’s unpack why.


1. Gravitational time dilation depends on distance

In general relativity, gravitational time dilation means that clocks run more slowly deeper in a gravitational well. For a (non‑rotating) black hole, the time-dilation factor depends on radius \(r\):

\[
\Delta t_{\infty} = \frac{\Delta t_{local}}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}}}
\]

Closer to the black hole → stronger relativistic effects.


2. A tidally locked planet is stretched across a gravitational gradient

A tidally locked planet orbiting a black hole has:

  • Near side: slightly closer to the black hole
  • Far side: slightly farther away

Because relativistic effects depend on distance, this means:

The near side experiences slightly stronger relativistic effects
The far side experiences slightly weaker relativistic effects

This includes:

  • Gravitational time dilation
  • Gravitational redshift
  • Spacetime curvature

So yes, the far side really does age infinitesimally faster than the near side.


3. How big is the difference?

For most realistic scenarios: absurdly small.

Example (conceptual):

  • Planet radius comparable to Earth
  • Orbiting a stellar-mass or supermassive black hole
  • Stable orbit well outside the event horizon

The fractional difference in time dilation across the planet is roughly:

\[
\Delta \left(\frac{\Delta t}{t}\right) \sim \frac{GM}{c^2} \cdot \frac{R_{planet}}{r^2}
\]

Even very close to a supermassive black hole, this difference is typically far smaller than what atomic clocks on Earth can detect—unless the planet is perilously close to the event horizon.


4. Extreme cases near the event horizon

If the planet were so close that this difference became noticeable:

  • Tidal forces would likely tear the planet apart (spaghettification)
  • Structural stresses would exceed planetary material strength
  • Stable solid planets probably couldn’t exist there

Ironically, this means:


If the relativistic difference across the planet is large, the planet probably can’t survive.



5. What about rotation and frame dragging?

If the black hole is rotating (a Kerr black hole):

  • Frame dragging slightly modifies spacetime
  • The near side still experiences stronger effects
  • The asymmetry is direction-dependent but does not reverse the conclusion

The near side always sits deeper in the gravitational well.


6. Summary

  • ✅ A tidally locked planet orbiting a black hole does experience different relativistic effects across its surface
  • ✅ The near side experiences stronger time dilation
  • ✅ The far side experiences slightly weaker relativistic effects
  • ⚠️ The difference is negligible unless the orbit is extremely close
  • ❌ If the difference is large enough to matter, the planet likely cannot remain intact


If you’d like, I can:

  • Estimate the effect for a specific black hole mass and orbital radius
  • Compare this to time dilation across Earth
  • Extend this to neutron stars or rotating black holes
  • Explore what an observer on the planet would actually see

Just tell me.